Pullen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pullen v. State

839 S.W.2d 695, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1496, 1992 WL 230221

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pullen v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 454 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 22, 1992·No. No. 61447·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The judgments are based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The judgments are based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Pullen v. State, 839 S.W.2d 695, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1496, 1992 WL 230221 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

839 S.W.2d 695 (Pullen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.