Pullen v. Radetic

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pullen v. Radetic

557 S.W.3d 537

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 2, 2018

DocketED 106112

StatusPublished

This text of 557 S.W.3d 537 (Pullen v. Radetic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pullen v. Radetic, 557 S.W.3d 537 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*538Mareeka Pullen appeals the trial court's summary judgment in favor of F. John Radetic and Cynthia Radetic on Appellant's petition for premises liability and strict liability. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*538Mareeka Pullen appeals the trial court's summary judgment in favor of F. John Radetic and Cynthia Radetic on Appellant's petition for premises liability and strict liability. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

557 S.W.3d 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pullen-v-radetic-moctapp-2018.