Pullen v. Radetic

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pullen v. Radetic

557 S.W.3d 537

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 2, 2018·No. ED 106112·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*538Mareeka Pullen appeals the trial court's summary judgment in favor of F. John Radetic and Cynthia Radetic on Appellant's petition for premises liability and strict liability. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*538Mareeka Pullen appeals the trial court's summary judgment in favor of F. John Radetic and Cynthia Radetic on Appellant's petition for premises liability and strict liability. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).

Pullen v. Radetic, 557 S.W.3d 537 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

557 S.W.3d 537 (Pullen v. Radetic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.