Pullen v. Haynes
This text of 77 Mass. 379 (Pullen v. Haynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This defendant was one of the parties to the execution, the return of which by the officer be now attempts to disprove. But no rule of law is better settled than this, namely, that the return of an officer, as to all matters which are properly the subject of his return, is conclusive, so far as it affects parties and privies to the returned process. Their only remedy for a false return is by action against the officer. Slayton v. Chester, 4 Mass. 478. Bott v. Burnell, 11 Mass. 165. Winchell v. Stiles, 15 Mass. 230. Bern v. Parker, 17 Mass. 601. Tilden v. Johnson, 6 Cush. 358.
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 Mass. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pullen-v-haynes-mass-1858.