Pullam v. Guidice
This text of 37 A.D.2d 932 (Pullam v. Guidice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Appellate Term, First Department, entered on June 8, 1971, affirmed. Respondents shall recover of appellants $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman and Tilzer, JJ.; Murphy, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I dissent and would reverse and order a new trial on the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Lupiano at Appellate Term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 A.D.2d 932, 325 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pullam-v-guidice-nyappdiv-1971.