Pullam v. Greater Eagle Wet Wash-Laundry Co.
137 Misc. 103, 243 N.Y.S. 55, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1354
Opinion
Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
The judgment in favor of Guglielmo against the plaintiff, in an action in which the plaintiff and the defendant in this suit were parties defendant, was not res adjudicata as to the issues involved in the instant suit (Self v. International Railway Co., 224 App. Div. 238; Report of Appellate Term, No. 23, January term, 1930.) No opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pullam v. Greater Eagle Wet Wash-Laundry Co., 137 Misc. 103, 243 N.Y.S. 55, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1354 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
137 Misc. 103 (Pullam v. Greater Eagle Wet Wash-Laundry Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boyne v. Samac Motors, Inc.
22 Misc. 2d 686 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)