Pulizotto v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pulizotto v. City of New York

304 A.D.2d 583, 756 N.Y.S.2d 892

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 7, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 304 A.D.2d 583 (Pulizotto v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pulizotto v. City of New York, 304 A.D.2d 583, 756 N.Y.S.2d 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Appeals Board of the New York City Department of Finance Parking Violations Bureau dated December 20, 2001, which affirmed the findings of the Administrative Law Judge dated October 10, 2001, after a hearing, that the petitioner is liable under the New York City Red Light Violations Monitoring Program.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the determination of the respondent is supported by substantial evidence (see CPLR 7803 [4]; see also 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]; Matter of Hy-Tech Coatings v New York State Dept. of Labor, 226 AD2d 378 [1996]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Luciano, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Appeals Board of the New York City Department of Finance Parking Violations Bureau dated December 20, 2001, which affirmed the findings of the Administrative Law Judge dated October 10, 2001, after a hearing, that the petitioner is liable under the New York City Red Light Violations Monitoring Program.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the determination of the respondent is supported by substantial evidence (see CPLR 7803 [4]; see also 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]; Matter of Hy-Tech Coatings v New York State Dept. of Labor, 226 AD2d 378 [1996]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Luciano, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

304 A.D.2d 583, 756 N.Y.S.2d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pulizotto-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack