Pulis v. . Schmidt

103 N.E. 1122, 209 N.Y. 606, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 1000
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 9, 1913·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Cuddeback and Hogan, JJ. Absent: Werner, J. Not sitting: Miller, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pulis v. . Schmidt, 103 N.E. 1122, 209 N.Y. 606, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 1000 (N.Y. 1913).

103 N.E. 1122 (Pulis v. . Schmidt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.