Pulis v. . Schmidt
103 N.E. 1122, 209 N.Y. 606, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 1000
This text of 103 N.E. 1122 (Pulis v. . Schmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pulis v. . Schmidt, 103 N.E. 1122, 209 N.Y. 606, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 1000 (N.Y. 1913).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Cuddeback and Hogan, JJ. Absent: Werner, J. Not sitting: Miller, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
103 N.E. 1122, 209 N.Y. 606, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 1000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pulis-v-schmidt-ny-1913.