Pulido v. Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative

556 So. 2d 543, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 924, 1990 WL 13522
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 15, 1990
DocketNo. 89-1991
StatusPublished

This text of 556 So. 2d 543 (Pulido v. Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pulido v. Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative, 556 So. 2d 543, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 924, 1990 WL 13522 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

ERVIN, Judge.

Appellant sought payment pursuant to Section 440.13(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1987), for medical treatment rendered by an unauthorized physician who had treated him after the employer/carrier had failed to respond timely to his request for such treatment. We find competent, substantial evidence in support of the judge’s implicit finding that the medical treatment rendered by the unauthorized physician was neither reasonable nor necessary.

AFFIRMED.

WENTWORTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
556 So. 2d 543, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 924, 1990 WL 13522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pulido-v-sugar-cane-growers-cooperative-fladistctapp-1990.