Pulido v. Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative
This text of 556 So. 2d 543 (Pulido v. Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant sought payment pursuant to Section 440.13(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1987), for medical treatment rendered by an unauthorized physician who had treated him after the employer/carrier had failed to respond timely to his request for such treatment. We find competent, substantial evidence in support of the judge’s implicit finding that the medical treatment rendered by the unauthorized physician was neither reasonable nor necessary.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
556 So. 2d 543, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 924, 1990 WL 13522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pulido-v-sugar-cane-growers-cooperative-fladistctapp-1990.