Pulido v. Lamarque

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL ROBERT PULIDO,  Petitioner-Appellee, No. 05-15916 v.  D.C. No. CHRIS CHRONES, CV-99-04933-CW Respondent-Appellant. 

MICHAEL ROBERT PULIDO,  No. 05-16308 Petitioner-Appellant, v.  D.C. No. CV-99-04933-CW CHRIS CHRONES, ORDER Respondent-Appellee.  Filed June 9, 2009

Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Petitioner-Appellant’s Petition for Reconsideration of Dis- positive Order, filed with this court on March 31, 2009 is GRANTED. The Order remanding the case, filed March 20, 2009 is VACATED.

Petitioner-Appellant’s Motion to file Supplemental Brief Following Supreme Court Remand, filed March 10, 2009 is GRANTED and Petitioner-Appellant’s Supplemental Brief is ordered FILED.

6829 6830 PULIDO v. CHRONES Respondent-Appellant is directed to file a responsive brief to Petitioner-Appellee’s Supplemental Brief to address the application of the harmless error standard of Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619 (1993). Respondent-Appellant shall respond within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, and Respondent-Appellant shall provide this court with ten (10) copies. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.