Pulichene v. Nightingale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pulichene v. Nightingale

246 A.D. 775

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 775 (Pulichene v. Nightingale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pulichene v. Nightingale, 246 A.D. 775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Three actions for damages arising out of an automobile collision. By stipulation they were consolidated and tried together. Appeal by defendant Paul Pulichene from the judgment and also from the order denying his motion for a new trial. Judgment and order of the County Court of Dutchess county unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present— Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ.; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Three actions for damages arising out of an automobile collision. By stipulation they were consolidated and tried together. Appeal by defendant Paul Pulichene from the judgment and also from the order denying his motion for a new trial. Judgment and order of the County Court of Dutchess county unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present— Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ.; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pulichene-v-nightingale-nyappdiv-1935.