Puleo v. Pagano

203 A.D.2d 544, 612 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4324
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 25, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 A.D.2d 544 (Puleo v. Pagano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Puleo v. Pagano, 203 A.D.2d 544, 612 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4324 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated September 19, 1991, which is in favor of the defendants, dismissing the complaint, and (2) from so much of an order of the same court, dated June 10, 1992, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the judgment is dismissed, as the judgment was superseded by the order dated June 10, 1992, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated June 10, 1992, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

The present action was commenced in December 1985. A pre-calendar conference pursuant to CPLR 3406 (b) and 22 NYCRR 202.56 was held on June 27, 1986. At that conference, the court directed all the parties to hold depositions on or before November 21, 1986, and further directed all discovery to be completed by January 30, 1987. The plaintiff was directed to file a certificate of readiness upon the completion of discovery. Subsequently, a stipulation extended the plaintiff’s time to complete discovery to December 31, 1988. By July 1991, when the defendants cross-moved for dismissal of the complaint, a certificate of readiness had not been filed. Moreover, the plaintiff did not at any time seek an extension of the December 31, 1988, deadline. In light of the plaintiff’s failure to comply with the foregoing directives of the trial court, we find that the dismissal of the complaint was proper (see, CPLR 3406 [b]; 22 NYCRR 202.56 [b] [1] [iv]; [2]). Balletta, J. P„ Rosenblatt, Ritter and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. North Shore LIJ Health System
119 A.D.3d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.D.2d 544, 612 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puleo-v-pagano-nyappdiv-1994.