Pulchtopek v. Pulchtopek

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pulchtopek v. Pulchtopek

805 So. 2d 71, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 227, 2002 WL 54631

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 16, 2002

DocketNo. 4D01-833

StatusPublished

This text of 805 So. 2d 71 (Pulchtopek v. Pulchtopek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pulchtopek v. Pulchtopek, 805 So. 2d 71, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 227, 2002 WL 54631 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final order of dissolution. The wife complains about the amount of alimony and the trial court’s failure to award attorney’s fees. Neither is an abuse of discretion. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla.1980). In particular, as to the attorney’s fees, the attorney had received a significant temporary award of fees, and the wife [72]*72actually received more than the husband in equitable distribution.

WARNER, FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final order of dissolution. The wife complains about the amount of alimony and the trial court’s failure to award attorney’s fees. Neither is an abuse of discretion. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla.1980). In particular, as to the attorney’s fees, the attorney had received a significant temporary award of fees, and the wife [72]*72actually received more than the husband in equitable distribution.

WARNER, FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

805 So. 2d 71, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 227, 2002 WL 54631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pulchtopek-v-pulchtopek-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack