Pulaski v. Lynch

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Pulaski v. Lynch

187 Misc. 768, 66 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3108

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1946

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 187 Misc. 768 (Pulaski v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pulaski v. Lynch, 187 Misc. 768, 66 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The tenant consented to the entry of a final order pursuant to a stipulation which was signed by both parties and their attorneys. Pursuant thereto he was permitted to remain on the premises for a period of six months. Under the circumstances, his consent to the final order may not be held to constitute a waiver prohibited by subdivision (d) of section 1 of the Bent Regulation for Housing in the New York City Defense-Rental Area (8 Federal Register 13915). (Ellenbogen v. Caldwell, 270 App. Div. 946.) There was no basis for dismissal of the petition on the ground of insufficiency.

The order dated April 1, 1946, should be reversed on the law, with $10 costs to the landlords, motion to vacate final order denied, with $10 costs, and final order in favor of landlords reinstated. Appeal from order dated March 14, 1946, should be dismissed, without costs, this order having been superseded by the order on reargument.

MacCrate, Smith and Steinbrink, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The tenant consented to the entry of a final order pursuant to a stipulation which was signed by both parties and their attorneys. Pursuant thereto he was permitted to remain on the premises for a period of six months. Under the circumstances, his consent to the final order may not be held to constitute a waiver prohibited by subdivision (d) of section 1 of the Bent Regulation for Housing in the New York City Defense-Rental Area (8 Federal Register 13915). (Ellenbogen v. Caldwell, 270 App. Div. 946.) There was no basis for dismissal of the petition on the ground of insufficiency.

The order dated April 1, 1946, should be reversed on the law, with $10 costs to the landlords, motion to vacate final order denied, with $10 costs, and final order in favor of landlords reinstated. Appeal from order dated March 14, 1946, should be dismissed, without costs, this order having been superseded by the order on reargument.

MacCrate, Smith and Steinbrink, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 Misc. 768, 66 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pulaski-v-lynch-nyappterm-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack