Pulak Barua D/B/A Sunshine Food Mart v. Ssp Partners D/B/A Ssp Petroleum

Court of Appeals of Texas

Pulak Barua D/B/A Sunshine Food Mart v. Ssp Partners D/B/A Ssp Petroleum

DecidedOctober 10, 2002

Docket13-02-00318-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Pulak Barua D/B/A Sunshine Food Mart v. Ssp Partners D/B/A Ssp Petroleum (Pulak Barua D/B/A Sunshine Food Mart v. Ssp Partners D/B/A Ssp Petroleum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pulak Barua D/B/A Sunshine Food Mart v. Ssp Partners D/B/A Ssp Petroleum, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-02-318-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

PULAK BARUA D/B/A SUNSHINE FOOD MART, Appellant,

v.

SSP PARTNERS D/B/A SSP PETROLEUM, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

of Nueces County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, PULAK BARUA D/B/A SUNSHINE FOOD MART, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 2 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 01-60445-2. Judgment in this cause was signed on February 25, 2002. A timely motion for new trial was filed on March 11, 2002. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant=s notice of appeal was due on May 25, 2002, but was not filed until June 4, 2002.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant=s failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 10th day of October, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-02-318-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

PULAK BARUA D/B/A SUNSHINE FOOD MART, Appellant,

v.

SSP PARTNERS D/B/A SSP PETROLEUM, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

of Nueces County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, PULAK BARUA D/B/A SUNSHINE FOOD MART, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 2 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 01-60445-2. Judgment in this cause was signed on February 25, 2002. A timely motion for new trial was filed on March 11, 2002. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant=s notice of appeal was due on May 25, 2002, but was not filed until June 4, 2002.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant=s failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 10th day of October, 2002.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Pulak Barua D/B/A Sunshine Food Mart v. Ssp Partners D/B/A Ssp Petroleum, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pulak-barua-dba-sunshine-food-mart-v-ssp-partners--texapp-2002.