Pula v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pula v. State

969 So. 2d 1173, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18815, 2007 WL 4208312

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 30, 2007

DocketNo. 5D07-2739

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 969 So. 2d 1173 (Pula v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pula v. State, 969 So. 2d 1173, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18815, 2007 WL 4208312 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pula appeals the denial of his most recent motion for post-conviction relief. Finding no merit in his argument, we affirm. In so doing, we take the additional step of barring Pula from filing any further pro se pleadings in this case.

Pula was tried and convicted of second degree murder eighteen years ago. His conviction was affirmed in Pula v. State, 578 So.2d 1115 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Since then Pula has filed multiple pro se motions for post-conviction relief, all of which have been denied by the trial court and this court. As a result, this court issued a show cause order pursuant to State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999). Pula’s response was meritless.

AFFIRMED; Future Pro Se Filings PROHIBITED.

PALMER, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI