Pujol v. Florida Unemployment Appeals

876 So. 2d 730, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9964, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1589
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 7, 2004
DocketNo. 3D03-2048
StatusPublished

This text of 876 So. 2d 730 (Pujol v. Florida Unemployment Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pujol v. Florida Unemployment Appeals, 876 So. 2d 730, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9964, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1589 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1980)(holding that the Commissions order is entitled to a presumption of correctness on appeal); Nisbet v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 769 So.2d 1120, 1121 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)(holding that a finding of disqualification of unemployment benefits will not be disturbed if it is supported by competent, substantial record evidence).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Nisbet v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
769 So. 2d 1120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
876 So. 2d 730, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9964, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pujol-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-fladistctapp-2004.