Pujol v. Florida Unemployment Appeals
876 So. 2d 730, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9964, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1589
Opinion
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1980)(holding that the Commissions order is entitled to a presumption of correctness on appeal); Nisbet v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 769 So.2d 1120, 1121 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)(holding that a finding of disqualification of unemployment benefits will not be disturbed if it is supported by competent, substantial record evidence).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pujol v. Florida Unemployment Appeals, 876 So. 2d 730, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9964, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1589 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
876 So. 2d 730 (Pujol v. Florida Unemployment Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Nisbet v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
769 So. 2d 1120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)