Pujo v. Fouchy

1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 156
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided July 1, 1880·No. No. 982·Published

Opinion

Egan, J.

The subsequent sale in error to Doyle could not affect the validity of the prior sale to Bundy. 2 R. 40; 4 R. 79; 10 A. 133. The United States cannot sell the same land to two different persons. A conveyance by the government cannot be defeated by a subsequent grant or patent. 11 L. 90; 13 A. 523; 16 A. 301; 23 A. 271; 24 A. 511. A patent obtained through error or fraud, or issued through error is void. 4 A. 262; 11 A. 506, 552, 56 1; 1 A. 151; 13 A. 356; 14 A. 77. Where two patents issue for the same land, the youngest will hold if issued on the oldest entry. 10 A. 183; 11 A. 552; 13 Peters, 436; 2 Howard, 318; 5 Cranch, 191.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pujo v. Fouchy, 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 156 (La. 1880).

1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 156 (Pujo v. Fouchy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bodley v. Taylor
9 U.S. 191 (Supreme Court, 1809)
Bagnell v. Broderick
38 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1839)
Birmingham v. Lesan
1 A. 151 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1885)
Richard v. Allen
11 A. 552 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1887)
Harris v. Kelley
13 A. 523 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1888)
Brown v. Commonwealth
2 Rawle 40 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1829)
Talbott v. Suit
13 A. 356 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1888)