Puig v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Puig v. State

761 So. 2d 354, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2802, 2000 WL 276366

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 15, 2000·No. No. 3D99-1329·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jorge Ignacio Puig appeals his conviction for burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. As to the theft count, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to establish the value of the stolen items and reject appellant’s argument to the contrary. See Pickles v. State, 313 So.2d 715, 717 (Fla.1975).

The appellant’s pro se argument that the trial court was biased against him is rejected because no motion for disqualification was filed in the trial court. Assuming arguendo such a motion had been filed, the arguments made by appellant for disqualification are legally insufficient.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jorge Ignacio Puig appeals his conviction for burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. As to the theft count, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to establish the value of the stolen items and reject appellant’s argument to the contrary. See Pickles v. State, 313 So.2d 715, 717 (Fla.1975).

The appellant’s pro se argument that the trial court was biased against him is rejected because no motion for disqualification was filed in the trial court. Assuming arguendo such a motion had been filed, the arguments made by appellant for disqualification are legally insufficient.

Affirmed.

Puig v. State, 761 So. 2d 354, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2802, 2000 WL 276366 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

761 So. 2d 354 (Puig v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related