Puig v. ALL MOTORS, INC.

14 So. 3d 268, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10380, 2009 WL 2243798
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 29, 2009
Docket3D08-2676
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 So. 3d 268 (Puig v. ALL MOTORS, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Puig v. ALL MOTORS, INC., 14 So. 3d 268, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10380, 2009 WL 2243798 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Aztec Med. Servs., Inc. v. Burger, 792 So.2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (holding that claims under Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) are arbitrable); cf. Hialeah Auto., LLC v. Basulto, 34 Fla. L. Weekly D248, D250, - So.3d -, -, 2009 WL 187584 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 28, 2009) (concluding that claims for declaratory or injunctive relief were not arbitrable where arbitration clause contained provision that arbitration award “shall be issued without a written opinion”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stovall v. State
14 So. 3d 268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 So. 3d 268, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10380, 2009 WL 2243798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puig-v-all-motors-inc-fladistctapp-2009.