Pugliese v. Horman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pugliese v. Horman

255 A.D. 932, 8 N.Y.S.2d 797, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5888

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 16, 1938·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The responsibility for this head-on collision was clearly a question of fact for the jury, and the verdict exonerating the defendant is fully supported, particularly by the evidence of the defendant himself and of the witnesses Bristol and Christensen. We have examined the exceptions to the reception of evidence and find no reversible error; nor do we find error in any of the rulings on request to charge in view of the main charge and the rulings on other requests. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The responsibility for this head-on collision was clearly a question of fact for the jury, and the verdict exonerating the defendant is fully supported, particularly by the evidence of the defendant himself and of the witnesses Bristol and Christensen. We have examined the exceptions to the reception of evidence and find no reversible error; nor do we find error in any of the rulings on request to charge in view of the main charge and the rulings on other requests. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Pugliese v. Horman, 255 A.D. 932, 8 N.Y.S.2d 797, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5888 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

255 A.D. 932 (Pugliese v. Horman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.