Pugliese v. Horman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pugliese v. Horman

255 A.D. 932, 8 N.Y.S.2d 797, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5888

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 932 (Pugliese v. Horman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pugliese v. Horman, 255 A.D. 932, 8 N.Y.S.2d 797, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5888 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The responsibility for this head-on collision was clearly a question of fact for the jury, and the verdict exonerating the defendant is fully supported, particularly by the evidence of the defendant himself and of the witnesses Bristol and Christensen. We have examined the exceptions to the reception of evidence and find no reversible error; nor do we find error in any of the rulings on request to charge in view of the main charge and the rulings on other requests. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The responsibility for this head-on collision was clearly a question of fact for the jury, and the verdict exonerating the defendant is fully supported, particularly by the evidence of the defendant himself and of the witnesses Bristol and Christensen. We have examined the exceptions to the reception of evidence and find no reversible error; nor do we find error in any of the rulings on request to charge in view of the main charge and the rulings on other requests. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 932, 8 N.Y.S.2d 797, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pugliese-v-horman-nyappdiv-1938.