Pugliese v. Actin Biomed LLC

139 A.D.3d 472, 29 N.Y.S.3d 799
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 10, 2016
Docket1118 103104/10
StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.D.3d 472 (Pugliese v. Actin Biomed LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pugliese v. Actin Biomed LLC, 139 A.D.3d 472, 29 N.Y.S.3d 799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered January 13, 2015, which granted defendants-respondents’ (defendants) motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

Plaintiff alleges, pursuant to Labor Law § 740, that she was constructively terminated from her employment with defendants in retaliation for objecting to defendants’ violation of Food and Drug Administration regulations in their conduct of certain clinical drug trials. Supreme Court erred when it granted defendants summary judgment, because there has been only limited discovery in this case, and therefore summary dismissal of the complaint is premature.

In light of defendants’ active litigation of this case since its *473 commencement and the fact that they raised the issue of arbitration for the first time in the present motion, we find that they have waived any right to compel arbitration (see e.g. Ryan v Kellogg Partners Inst. Servs., 58 AD3d 481 [1st Dept 2009]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Moskowitz, Kapnick and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ryan v. Kellogg Partners Institutional Services
58 A.D.3d 481 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 A.D.3d 472, 29 N.Y.S.3d 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pugliese-v-actin-biomed-llc-nyappdiv-2016.