Pughsley v. Pughsley, Tarver & Co.

1 Ga. L. Rep. 239
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 239 (Pughsley v. Pughsley, Tarver & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pughsley v. Pughsley, Tarver & Co., 1 Ga. L. Rep. 239 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

Blandford, J.

Where land was conveyed in fee simple to a woman and her children, this was riot a trust estate, and the chancellor could not, upon application by the woman, for herself and minor children, and upon the appointment of a guardian ad litem, pass an order at chambers authorizing the sale of the 'land and reinvestment of the fund; and where the children sought to follow and claim certain funds as the proceeds of such sale and as being trust funds, there was no error [240]*240in rejecting from evidence the application and the order for the sale and reinvestment, and parol testimony as to what was done with the money. The decree in vacation ordering the sale was void, and the title of the children was not vested thereby. Rogers et al. vs. Griffin et al. (present term).

Twiggs & Verdery, for plaintiff in error. T. H. Potter; Hines & Rogers ; J. J. Jones; Livingston & Harrington ; Cain & Polhill, for defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ga. L. Rep. 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pughsley-v-pughsley-tarver-co-ga-1885.