Pugh v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Pugh v. State

94 S.W.2d 435, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 711

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 13, 1936

DocketNo. 18293

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.W.2d 435 (Pugh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pugh v. State, 94 S.W.2d 435, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 711 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Since the conviction of the appellant, the law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended) upon which the prosecution is founded has been repealed (Vernon’s Ann. P.C. art. 666 — 49). See Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Since the conviction of the appellant, the law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended) upon which the prosecution is founded has been repealed (Vernon’s Ann. P.C. art. 666 — 49). See Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 S.W.2d 435, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pugh-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack