Pugh v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Pugh v. State

1927 OK CR 214, 258 P. 1051, 37 Okla. Crim. 400, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 76

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 8, 1927

DocketNo. A-5917.

StatusPublished

This text of 1927 OK CR 214 (Pugh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pugh v. State, 1927 OK CR 214, 258 P. 1051, 37 Okla. Crim. 400, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 76 (Okla. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, P. J.

On information charging that in Hughes county, February 20, 1925, Ed Pugh did sell whisky to one Arch Roberts, he was tried and convicted and was sentenced to pay a fine of $150 and to be con *401 fined in jail for 30 days. From the judgment rendered September 26th, an appeal was perfected by petition in error and transcript of the record proper.

No brief has been filed and no appearance made in behalf of plaintiff in error in this court.

An examination of the record fails to disclose any material error. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

EDWARDS and DAVENPORT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, P. J.

On information charging that in Hughes county, February 20, 1925, Ed Pugh did sell whisky to one Arch Roberts, he was tried and convicted and was sentenced to pay a fine of $150 and to be con *401 fined in jail for 30 days. From the judgment rendered September 26th, an appeal was perfected by petition in error and transcript of the record proper.

No brief has been filed and no appearance made in behalf of plaintiff in error in this court.

An examination of the record fails to disclose any material error. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

EDWARDS and DAVENPORT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1927 OK CR 214, 258 P. 1051, 37 Okla. Crim. 400, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pugh-v-state-oklacrimapp-1927.