Pugh v. Probstfield

705 P.2d 1158, 75 Or. App. 328
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 18, 1985
Docket84-0331C; CA A32182
StatusPublished

This text of 705 P.2d 1158 (Pugh v. Probstfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pugh v. Probstfield, 705 P.2d 1158, 75 Or. App. 328 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this post-conviction proceeding, defendant concedes that the trial court erred in denying petitioner the right to file a delayed direct appeal of his conviction. We have concluded that the concession is correct.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment allowing defendant 30 days within which to file a delayed direct appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
705 P.2d 1158, 75 Or. App. 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pugh-v-probstfield-orctapp-1985.