Pugh v. Powell
This text of 11 A. 570 (Pugh v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The objection that there was no privity between the parties was not well taken. The money was paid to the defendant below for the use and benefit of the plaintiff Hannah J. Powell, me Davis. Under such circumstances it is well settled that assumpsit for money had and received will lie in the name of the person for whose benefit it was paid. It was money which the ■defendant in good conscience ought not to retain.
The statute of limitations was no bar. The right of action accrued during the minority of the plaintiff. This suit was brought within six years of her arrival at age.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 A. 570, 8 Sadler 515, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pugh-v-powell-pa-1887.