Pugh v. Montgomery County Board of Education
This text of 667 F. App'x 398 (Pugh v. Montgomery County Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Adrian D. Pugh appeals the district court’s judgment granting the Montgomery County Board of Education’s summary judgment motion on her race discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2015). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant [399]*399Pughs application to proceed m forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pugh v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Educ., No. 8:13-cv-02862-DKC, 2016 WL 560793 (D. Md. Feb. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
667 F. App'x 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pugh-v-montgomery-county-board-of-education-ca4-2016.