Pugh v. Archie Davis Construction Co.
This text of 185 So. 2d 459 (Pugh v. Archie Davis Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari the employer seeks review of an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 17, 1965.
The employee-claimant seeks review of the same order by cross-petition for writ of certiorari.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
[460]*460The petition and the cross-petition are therefore denied.
The claimant is awarded a fee of $100 for the services of his attorneys in successfully resisting the petition for writ of cer-tiorari.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 So. 2d 459, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pugh-v-archie-davis-construction-co-fla-1966.