Pugh-Ouza v. Springhill Suites

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedAugust 5, 2019
Docket1:18-cv-01755
StatusUnknown

This text of Pugh-Ouza v. Springhill Suites (Pugh-Ouza v. Springhill Suites) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pugh-Ouza v. Springhill Suites, (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 9 /S ( 14

SHANELL PUGH-OUZA, Plaintiff, No. 18-CV-1755 (RA) Vv. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SPRINGHILL SUITES, et al., Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: Now before the Court is Magistrate Judge Freeman’s July 9, 2019 Report and Recommendation (the “Report”), see Dkt. 103, which recommends that the Court enter an order dismissing Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Arberie Karacica (“Karacica”), without conditions and without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The parties have not filed any objections to the Report. “When the parties make no objections to the Report, the Court may adopt the Report if there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Galeana v. Lemongrass on Broadway Corp., 120 F. Supp. 3d 306, 310 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted). Having reviewed the record for clear error, and found none, the Court adopts Judge Freeman’s Report in its entirety. Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered that: (1) Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Karacica are dismissed without conditions and without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), and (2) Defendants’ motion for involuntary dismissal of those claims pursuant to Rule 41(b) is denied. The choice not to file written objections waives appellate review of this decision. See United States v. James, 712 F.3d 79, 105 (2d Cir. 2013).

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. 96.

SO ORDERED. Dated: August 5, 2019 New York, New York Rone Abrams United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. James and Mallay
712 F.3d 79 (Second Circuit, 2013)
Galeana v. Lemongrass on Broadway Corp.
120 F. Supp. 3d 306 (S.D. New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pugh-Ouza v. Springhill Suites, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pugh-ouza-v-springhill-suites-nysd-2019.