Pugatch v. State

560 So. 2d 419, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3156, 1990 WL 58552
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 1990·No. No. 88-0738·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for a reconstruction of the record. The trial court has certified that such reconstruction cannot be accomplished. We find merit in appellant’s argument that without a complete transcript of the trial proceedings, or an adequate reconstruction, appellate review would be futile.

Therefore, we reverse and remand this case for a new trial. See Yancey v. State, 267 So.2d 836 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972); Felton v. State, 523 So.2d 775 (Pla. 3d DCA 1988).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pugatch v. State, 560 So. 2d 419, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3156, 1990 WL 58552 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

560 So. 2d 419 (Pugatch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ader v. State
814 So. 2d 461 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
JF HOFF ELEC. CO. v. Goldstein
560 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)