Pugatch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pugatch v. State

560 So. 2d 419, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3156, 1990 WL 58552

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 9, 1990

DocketNo. 88-0738

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 560 So. 2d 419 (Pugatch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pugatch v. State, 560 So. 2d 419, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3156, 1990 WL 58552 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for a reconstruction of the record. The trial court has certified that such reconstruction cannot be accomplished. We find merit in appellant’s argument that without a complete transcript of the trial proceedings, or an adequate reconstruction, appellate review would be futile.

Therefore, we reverse and remand this case for a new trial. See Yancey v. State, 267 So.2d 836 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972); Felton v. State, 523 So.2d 775 (Pla. 3d DCA 1988).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI