Pugach v. Liggett Group, Inc.

434 N.E.2d 241, 55 N.Y.2d 922, 449 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3116
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 11, 1982·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[924]*924OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order should be affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division. We would only add that this court has held subdivision 21 of section 292 of the Executive Law, as it existed prior to July 10, 1979, applicable to discharges of employees as well as to refusals to hire job applicants (e.g., City of New York v Cole, 48 NY2d 707; Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v Averill Park Cent. School Dist., 46 NY2d 950).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pugach v. Liggett Group, Inc., 434 N.E.2d 241, 55 N.Y.2d 922, 449 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3116 (N.Y. 1982).

434 N.E.2d 241 (Pugach v. Liggett Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New York State Department of Mental Hygiene v. State Division of Human Rights
103 A.D.2d 546 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)