Pugach v. Liggett Group, Inc.
This text of 434 N.E.2d 241 (Pugach v. Liggett Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[924]*924OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order should be affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division. We would only add that this court has held subdivision 21 of section 292 of the Executive Law, as it existed prior to July 10, 1979, applicable to discharges of employees as well as to refusals to hire job applicants (e.g., City of New York v Cole, 48 NY2d 707; Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v Averill Park Cent. School Dist., 46 NY2d 950).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
434 N.E.2d 241, 55 N.Y.2d 922, 449 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pugach-v-liggett-group-inc-ny-1982.