Puerto Rico v. O'Keefe

155 F. Supp. 212, 1957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2913
CourtDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico
DecidedAugust 16, 1957
DocketCr. No. 159-57
StatusPublished

This text of 155 F. Supp. 212 (Puerto Rico v. O'Keefe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Puerto Rico v. O'Keefe, 155 F. Supp. 212, 1957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2913 (prd 1957).

Opinion

RUIZ-NAZARIO, Judge.

Petitioner in the above entitled case filed in this Court on August 5, 1957, a petition for the removal of this Criminal Action, pursuant to Sec. 1446(a) of Title 28 U.S.C.A. On August 8,1957, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico filed a motion in opposition to the petition for removal requesting that it be dismissed and the case remanded to the District Court of Puerto Rico, San Juan Section.

A hearing on said petition and motion to remand was held on August 16, 1957. Petitioner testified in his behalf and an affidavit of Lt. Commander Fuller of the United States Coast Guard attached to the Commonwealth’s opposition and accepted as true by the petitioner, in which it is stated that on the night of the ,25th of August 1957 petitioner was on liberty with no other military requirement than to return to his post at 7:50 A.M. on August 26, 1957, was admitted in evidence. On the basis of said testimony and affidavit the court holds that petitioner was not acting within the scope of his duty and under color of his status as a member of the Coast Guard of the United States at the time of the accident which gave rise to the criminal action against him by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the subject of the.removal herein and further holds that the other matters alleged in the petition are not meritorious legal grounds warranting removal of petitioner’s cases to this Court. Snypp v. Ohio, 6 Cir., 70 F.2d 535, certiorari denied 293 U.S. 563, 55 S.Ct.74, 79 L.Ed. 663; Lamson v. Superior Court, D.C., 12 F.Supp. 812; Kentucky v. Powers, 201 U.S. 1, 26 S.Ct. 387, 50 L.Ed. 633.

It appears, therefore, that this case was removed improvidently and without jurisdiction to this court and pursuant to Sec. 1447(c), Title 28, U.S. C.A., it is hereby ordered that it be remanded to the court from where it was so removed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kentucky v. Powers
201 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1906)
Snypp v. State of Ohio
70 F.2d 535 (Sixth Circuit, 1934)
Lamson v. Superior Court
12 F. Supp. 812 (N.D. California, 1935)
Central Iron & Steel Co. v. United States
293 U.S. 563 (Supreme Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 F. Supp. 212, 1957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puerto-rico-v-okeefe-prd-1957.