Puente v. Santisario

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Puente v. Santisario

281 A.D. 844, 119 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3504

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 16, 1953·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for assault, plaintiff appeals [845] from so much of an order which denied in part a motion to modify a notice for his examination before trial. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. There was no abuse of discretion in permitting the examination of appellant as to the injuries which he claims he sustained. (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 121-a.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for assault, plaintiff appeals [845] from so much of an order which denied in part a motion to modify a notice for his examination before trial. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. There was no abuse of discretion in permitting the examination of appellant as to the injuries which he claims he sustained. (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 121-a.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur.

Puente v. Santisario, 281 A.D. 844, 119 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3504 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

281 A.D. 844 (Puente v. Santisario) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related