Puente v. Santisario

281 A.D. 844, 119 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3504
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 16, 1953
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 281 A.D. 844 (Puente v. Santisario) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Puente v. Santisario, 281 A.D. 844, 119 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3504 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for assault, plaintiff appeals [845]*845from so much of an order which denied in part a motion to modify a notice for his examination before trial. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. There was no abuse of discretion in permitting the examination of appellant as to the injuries which he claims he sustained. (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 121-a.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hackett v. Reed
207 Misc. 311 (New York Supreme Court, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D. 844, 119 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puente-v-santisario-nyappdiv-1953.