Pueblo v. Ceferino

35 P.R. Dec. 1056, 1926 PR Sup. LEXIS 269
CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico
DecidedMarch 10, 1926
DocketNo. 2680
StatusPublished

This text of 35 P.R. Dec. 1056 (Pueblo v. Ceferino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pueblo v. Ceferino, 35 P.R. Dec. 1056, 1926 PR Sup. LEXIS 269 (prsupreme 1926).

Opinion

Siendo el único error alegado que la acusación no contiene hechos sufi-cientes para determinar un delito público, apareciendo que dicha acusación sigue las palabras del estatuto siendo por tanto suficiente y que en ella se alega haberse cometido' un delito en la persona de Julio Rosa que es nombre de va-rón; visto el caso de People v. Carroll, 1 Cal. App. 2, y los de People v. Terry, 127 Cal. 99, Louis v. State, 36 Texas Criminal Rep. 37; 61 Am. St. Rep. 831, 35 S. W. 372, y People v. Williams, 59 Cal. 397; y apareciendo que no se ha cometido error fundamental alguno, se confirma la sentencia apelada.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Carroll
81 P. 680 (California Court of Appeal, 1905)
People v. Terrill
59 P. 836 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Lewis v. State
35 S.W. 372 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1896)
People v. Williams
59 Cal. 397 (California Supreme Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 P.R. Dec. 1056, 1926 PR Sup. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pueblo-v-ceferino-prsupreme-1926.