Pueblo v. Bush

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 6, 1999
Docket98-50859
StatusUnpublished

This text of Pueblo v. Bush (Pueblo v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pueblo v. Bush, (5th Cir. 1999).

Opinion

No. 98-50859 -1-

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50859 Summary Calendar

YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GEORGE W. BUSH, JR.; STATE OF TEXAS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-98-CV-47 - - - - - - - - - - August 5, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Appellant, Ysleta del Sur Pueblo, appeals the district

court’s grant of Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss on

behalf of Texas Governor George W. Bush, Jr. and the State of

Texas.

On May 3, 1999 the Appellant filed an unopposed motion to

withdraw the appeal of the district court’s order in favor of

Governor George W. Bush, Jr. The Appellant’s motion is GRANTED.

The remaining appeal seeks reversal of the district court’s

order in favor of the State of Texas. The Appellant seeks reversal

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-50859 -2-

so it can obtain a judicial declaration under the Declaratory

Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, that the Appellant’s gaming

activities at its casino are in compliance with Texas law. The

Appellant argues that the lower court erred in barring the

Appellant’s claim on Eleventh Amendment grounds.

We have reviewed the record and briefs filed by the parties

and find that the Appellant has failed to meet its burden to

establish the standing and ripeness requirements which are

necessary to invoke this court’s jurisdiction under Article III of

the United States Constitution. See Lujan v. Defenders of

Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992). We therefore affirm the district

court’s jurisdictional dismissal on an alternate ground. See

Esteves v. Brock, 106 F.3d 674, 676 (5th Cir. 1997); United States

v. Real Property Located at 14301 Gateway Boulevard West, El Paso

County Texas, 123 F.3d 312, 313 (5th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Esteves v. Brock
106 F.3d 674 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. 14301 Gateway Boulevard West
123 F.3d 312 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
504 U.S. 555 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pueblo v. Bush, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pueblo-v-bush-ca5-1999.