Pueblo of Santa Rosa v. Fall
273 U.S. 678, 47 S. Ct. 106
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 25, 1926
DocketNo. 511
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 273 U.S. 678 (Pueblo of Santa Rosa v. Fall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pueblo of Santa Rosa v. Fall, 273 U.S. 678, 47 S. Ct. 106 (1926).
Opinion
The petition for a writ of certiorari in this case is granted and the case set for hearing on January 10 next, after the cases heretofore assigned for that day, on the issue as to the existence of authority of counsel who filed the bill to represent complainant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Peet Stock Remedy Co. v. McMullen
32 F.2d 669 (Eighth Circuit, 1929)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
273 U.S. 678, 47 S. Ct. 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pueblo-of-santa-rosa-v-fall-scotus-1926.