Puebla, Edward Steven
This text of Puebla, Edward Steven (Puebla, Edward Steven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-73,366-02
EX PARTE EDWARD PUEBLA, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-15-202364-A IN THE 450TH DISTRICT COURT FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated and was sentenced to sixteen years’
imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of
conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary because trial counsel
failed to advise him of a ten year plea offer, failed to investigate possible inconsistencies in the
police officer’s statement, and improperly advised him to plead guilty without a recommendation
because he knew the judge. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Hill
v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).
Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings 2
of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to
respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out
in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether
Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court
shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC . art. 26.04. If
counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s
name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleged
deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems
appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: April 28, 2021
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Puebla, Edward Steven, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puebla-edward-steven-texcrimapp-2021.