Puckett v. State

1930 OK CR 104, 287 P. 1075, 46 Okla. Crim. 360, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 485
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 15, 1930
DocketNo. A-7065.
StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 104 (Puckett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Puckett v. State, 1930 OK CR 104, 287 P. 1075, 46 Okla. Crim. 360, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 485 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

EDWARDS, P. J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of McCurtain county on a charge of uttering a forged instrument, and was sentenced to serve a term of three years in the state penitentiary.

The case was tried in December, 1927, and the appeal was lodged in this court in June, 1928. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time the case was submitted.

We have examined the record and find that the evidence reasonably sustains the verdict and judgment, and. no jurisdictional nor fundamental error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1930 OK CR 104, 287 P. 1075, 46 Okla. Crim. 360, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puckett-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.