Puckett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Puckett v. State

1930 OK CR 104, 287 P. 1075, 46 Okla. Crim. 360, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 485

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided March 15, 1930·No. No. A-7065.·Published

Opinion

EDWARDS, P. J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of McCurtain county on a charge of uttering a forged instrument, and was sentenced to serve a term of three years in the state penitentiary.

The case was tried in December, 1927, and the appeal was lodged in this court in June, 1928. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time the case was submitted.

We have examined the record and find that the evidence reasonably sustains the verdict and judgment, and. no jurisdictional nor fundamental error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EDWARDS, P. J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of McCurtain county on a charge of uttering a forged instrument, and was sentenced to serve a term of three years in the state penitentiary.

The case was tried in December, 1927, and the appeal was lodged in this court in June, 1928. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time the case was submitted.

We have examined the record and find that the evidence reasonably sustains the verdict and judgment, and. no jurisdictional nor fundamental error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Puckett v. State, 1930 OK CR 104, 287 P. 1075, 46 Okla. Crim. 360, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 485 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

1930 OK CR 104 (Puckett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.