Puckett v. State

163 S.E. 218, 44 Ga. App. 794, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 520
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 17, 1932
Docket22070
StatusPublished

This text of 163 S.E. 218 (Puckett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Puckett v. State, 163 S.E. 218, 44 Ga. App. 794, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 520 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence authorized the verdict, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial, based on the usual general grounds only, was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., eonewrs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 S.E. 218, 44 Ga. App. 794, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puckett-v-state-gactapp-1932.