Puckett v. State
This text of 114 S.E. 68 (Puckett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. None of the excerpts from the charge of the court, complained of in the amendment to the motion for a new trial, when considered in the light of the facts of the case, shows reversible error.
2. In view of the proof of the incriminatory admission of the accused and the other evidence adduced upon the trial, it cannot be held, as a matter of law, that the verdict was unauthorized by any evidence; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 S.E. 68, 29 Ga. App. 50, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puckett-v-state-gactapp-1922.