Puckett v. State
125 S.E. 208, 159 Ga. 230, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 417
Opinion
The motion for new trial in this case contains' only the usual general grounds, that the verdict was contrary to the evidence and decidedly against the weight of the evidence; but the record discloses that the evidence for the State, if credible, was sufficient to support the verdict; and the jury being the judges of the weight of the evidence, this court can not disturb the judgment of the lower court refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Puckett v. State, 125 S.E. 208, 159 Ga. 230, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 417 (Ga. 1924).
125 S.E. 208 (Puckett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Styles v. State
95 S.E.2d 279 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Stembridge v. State
60 S.E.2d 491 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Danforth v. State
44 S.E.2d 818 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Gragg v. State
41 S.E.2d 274 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Jackson v. State
36 S.E.2d 208 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Brown v. State
31 S.E.2d 85 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Close v. State
28 S.E.2d 672 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Moody v. State
70 Ga. App. 829 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Harrington v. State
27 S.E.2d 352 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Holton v. State
7 S.E.2d 202 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Carter v. State
197 S.E. 333 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Beecher v. State
197 S.E. 329 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)