Puckett v. North Carolina Department of Correction
This text of 724 S.E.2d 915 (Puckett v. North Carolina Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Johnny Max PUCKETT
v.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, David Mitchell, Richard L. Terry, Mark Edwards, and Cherry P. Huskins.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Harvey L. Kennedy, Winston-Salem, for Puckett, Johnny Max.
Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, for N.C. Dept. of Correction, et al.
Robert F. Orr, Raleigh, for N.C. Institute for Constitutional Law.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiff on the 21st of June 2011 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendant, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th of April 2012."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of June 2011 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th of April 2012."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
724 S.E.2d 915, 2012 WL 1378330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puckett-v-north-carolina-department-of-correction-nc-2012.