Puckett v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Puckett v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.

99 S.E. 470, 23 Ga. App. 736, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 323

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 14, 1919

Docket10167

StatusPublished

This text of 99 S.E. 470 (Puckett v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Puckett v. Georgia Railway & Power Co., 99 S.E. 470, 23 Ga. App. 736, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 323 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. Under the pleadings and the evidence, the court did not'err in directing a verdict for the defendant, or in refusing to grant a new trial.

2. Even if the rejection of testimony as complained of in’ the motion for a new trial was error, it does not, under all the facts of the case, require a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, P. J.

1. Under the pleadings and the evidence, the court did not'err in directing a verdict for the defendant, or in refusing to grant a new trial.

2. Even if the rejection of testimony as complained of in’ the motion for a new trial was error, it does not, under all the facts of the case, require a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 S.E. 470, 23 Ga. App. 736, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puckett-v-georgia-railway-power-co-gactapp-1919.