Puckett v. Bollar
189 F. App'x 680
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
A review of the record and response to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Puckett v. Bollar, 189 F. App'x 680 (9th Cir. 2006).
189 F. App'x 680 (Puckett v. Bollar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. James Lynn Hooton
693 F.2d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)