Puckett v. Bollar

189 F. App'x 680
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 21, 2006·No. No. 05-36220·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

A review of the record and response to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Puckett v. Bollar, 189 F. App'x 680 (9th Cir. 2006).

189 F. App'x 680 (Puckett v. Bollar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. James Lynn Hooton
693 F.2d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)