Puchall v. Houghton, Cluck, Coughlin & Riley

808 F.2d 1373
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 29, 1987
DocketNo. 86-3594
StatusPublished

This text of 808 F.2d 1373 (Puchall v. Houghton, Cluck, Coughlin & Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Puchall v. Houghton, Cluck, Coughlin & Riley, 808 F.2d 1373 (9th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
808 F.2d 1373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puchall-v-houghton-cluck-coughlin-riley-ca9-1987.