Puchal v. Puchal
This text of 273 A.D.2d 368 (Puchal v. Puchal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered March 10, 1999, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Platt, J.H.O.), dated May 25, 1999, as denied his motion to vacate the judgment entered upon his default in appearing at a preliminary conference.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The appellant did not demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his default and a meritorious defense. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying [369]*369his motion to vacate the judgment entered upon his default (see, Baumer v Baumer, 268 AD2d 495; Koslosky v Koslosky, 267 AD2d 357; Bambino v Bambino, 261 AD2d 426). Sullivan, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.D.2d 368, 711 N.Y.S.2d 330, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puchal-v-puchal-nyappdiv-2000.