Puc of the State of California v. Ferc
This text of Puc of the State of California v. Ferc (Puc of the State of California v. Ferc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED FOR PUBLICATION AUG 31 2006 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS CATHY A. CATTERSON, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF Nos. 01-71051, 01-71321, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; et al., 01-71544, 02-70254, 02-70266, 02-70275, 02-70282, 02-70285, Petitioners, 02-70301, 02-72113, 03-73887, 03-74252, 03-74527, 03-74531, v. 03-74594, 04-73501. (Scope/Transaction Cases) FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,
Respondent.
BONNEVILLE POWER Nos. 02-70262, 02-70270, ADMINISTRATION; et al., 02-70274, 02-70294, 03-70185. (Jurisdiction Cases) Petitioners,
v. ORDER
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,
Respondent. Before: THOMAS, Circuit Judge
An amended opinion has been filed contemporaneously with this Order. The
amended opinion was filed in response to requests for correction of certain portions of
the factual recitation of the case. Objections were filed to some of the requests on the
basis that the proposed amendments would affect the substance of the prior opinion.
After examining the requests, the panel agreed that some amendments were appropriate
to correct the factual record and prevent subsequent misinterpretation of portions of the
prior opinion. Therefore, rather than defer the requests until consideration of petitions
for rehearing, we believed that some corrections should be made promptly. The panel
has deferred taking action on some of the other requests until it considers any petitions
for rehearing.
In sum, the amended opinion does not contain any changes to the substance of
the holdings. It only contains corrections to the factual record and a few other
technical corrections. Given that, the previous orders pertaining to the time for filing
petitions for rehearing remain in effect, unaltered by the filing of the amended opinion.
However, the petitions should reference the corrected amended opinion filed today,
rather than the original opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Puc of the State of California v. Ferc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puc-of-the-state-of-california-v-ferc-ca9-2006.