Publix Supermarkets, Inc. v. Harris
This text of 691 So. 2d 1169 (Publix Supermarkets, Inc. v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The employer and servicing agent appeal an order which included an award of permanent total disability (PTD) benefits. We conclude that there was no claim pending for PTD benefits, and therefore the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) erred in awarding such benefits. See Southeast Recycling v. Cottongim, 639 So.2d 155, 157 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Kaplan Industries, Inc. v. Rowlett, 565 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). We find no merit in any of the other issues raised on appeal.
Accordingly, we REVERSE IN PART, AFFIRM IN PART, and REMAND.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
691 So. 2d 1169, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4005, 1997 WL 186279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/publix-supermarkets-inc-v-harris-fladistctapp-1997.