Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Lindholm

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Lindholm

243 So. 2d 8

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 19, 1971·No. No. 70-417·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Publix Super Markets, Inc., appeals from a final judgment rendered for the plaintiff upon an adverse jury verdict.

Appellant contends the evidence at trial was insufficient to establish actionable negligence and liability on its part.

We have reviewed the record and find this contention on behalf of appellant to be insufficient and hold that the trial court was correct in its rulings and in permitting the jury to determine the issues presented. See Voelker v. Combined Ins. Co. of America, Fla.1954, 73 So.2d 403; Carls Markets v. Meyer, Fla.1953, 69 So.2d 789; and Bars v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Fla.App.1969, 222 So.2d 445.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Publix Super Markets, Inc., appeals from a final judgment rendered for the plaintiff upon an adverse jury verdict.

Appellant contends the evidence at trial was insufficient to establish actionable negligence and liability on its part.

We have reviewed the record and find this contention on behalf of appellant to be insufficient and hold that the trial court was correct in its rulings and in permitting the jury to determine the issues presented. See Voelker v. Combined Ins. Co. of America, Fla.1954, 73 So.2d 403; Carls Markets v. Meyer, Fla.1953, 69 So.2d 789; and Bars v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Fla.App.1969, 222 So.2d 445.

Affirmed.

Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Lindholm, 243 So. 2d 8 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

243 So. 2d 8 (Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Lindholm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related