Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Leland
This text of 608 So. 2d 110 (Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Leland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appealed order is affirmed in all respects save one. The award of attendant care benefits from the date of the accident to the date of the order is not supported by competent, substantial evidence and is reversed. While the evidence demonstrates a need for attendant care after Claimant’s discharge from the hospital on September 14, 1990, the testifying doctor failed to state the extent of care so required. Accordingly, we remand with leave to present further evidence as to the extent of such care.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
608 So. 2d 110, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11490, 1992 WL 312765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/publix-super-markets-inc-v-leland-fladistctapp-1992.